TWS/meta
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 17 Pull requests 1 Packages Projects 2 Releases Wiki Activity

Ratify the bylaws #3

New issue
Open
opened 2023-06-24 06:14:27 -04:00 by scott · 2 comments
scott commented 2023-06-24 06:14:27 -04:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
scott added this to the Incorporation project 2023-06-24 06:14:27 -04:00
scott commented 2023-06-24 07:22:44 -04:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

We need to

  • Remove the references to named officers. Delaware doesn't require any named officers.
  • Explicitly state our payout model
  • Modify trial period definition

We need to come to consensus on the specific wording. Discuss!

We need to - [ ] Remove the references to named officers. Delaware doesn't require any named officers. - [ ] Explicitly state our payout model - [ ] Modify trial period definition We need to come to consensus on the specific wording. Discuss!
scott commented 2023-06-24 07:33:23 -04:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Regarding the trial period:

The NMNM ("upstream") bylaws were written with a more retail- and factory-style environment in mind. It lists the trial period before becoming a member as "five working days". I'm not sure I think this makes a ton of sense in the context of the code and infrastructure-as-code work that we'll be doing. IMO a more appropriate measure would be completed tasks, i.e. pull requests. Since a lot of projects see many "drive-by" single contribution contributors, I think 2 contributions (merged pull requests) should make someone eligible to become a member.

On the other hand, I'm also proposing that pay be divided according to hours worked, so maybe we could just make the trial period "X working hours". 🤷

Regarding the trial period: The NMNM ("upstream") bylaws were written with a more retail- and factory-style environment in mind. It lists the trial period before becoming a member as "five working days". I'm not sure I think this makes a ton of sense in the context of the code and infrastructure-as-code work that we'll be doing. IMO a more appropriate measure would be completed tasks, i.e. pull requests. Since a lot of projects see many "drive-by" single contribution contributors, I think 2 contributions (merged pull requests) should make someone eligible to become a member. On the other hand, I'm also proposing that pay be divided according to hours worked, so maybe we could just make the trial period "X working hours". 🤷
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
mission-statement
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
  
backlog

something that is not urgent but may be done in the future

  
bug

Something is not working

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
question

More information is needed

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
backlog
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Incorporation
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: TWS/meta#3
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?